Literary tools in the Book of Revelation

How did the original audience actually read the book of Revelation? There were no headings, no paragraph breaks, no chapters or verses — just a continuous run of text. Let’s take a look at this very different way of reading, and what it means for how we study the book today.

Introduction

Hebrew literature works very differently from ours. It had no chapters or verses, just letters running in rows with minimal graphic or visual cues, because it was meant to be read aloud and heard, not scanned by eye on a page.

Even so, the text carries indicators for where a story begins and ends, how stories connect and get organized, and where the emphasis falls — and even a deliberate break in that structure can signal something to the reader. Learning to recognize these structures gives us a much richer understanding of the text, but we have to be careful not to force patterns onto passages where the author never intended them.

Basic steps

To read this kind of literature well, it helps to follow three steps.

1. Identify the unit.

   • Units can occur at the level of a single word or span much larger blocks of text.
   • This happens on a cascading scale, because the human brain can’t track too many small units at once — so they’re usually grouped into sets of 3 to 9, which are then collected into a larger “super unit.”

2. Analyze how these units are arranged.

   • The arrangement could be repetitive, parallel, or non-linear.

3. Consider how that structure relates to meaning.

   • It shows where the author’s focus lies.
   • In a symmetrical structure, the emphasis usually sits at the center.
   • Mixing parallels and contrasts within a structure can itself be used for emphasis.
   • Breaks in the flow can also draw the reader’s attention.

Identify units

The first step, identifying the units themselves, breaks down into three parts: start markers, end markers, and independence.

Start markers can appear on their own or in combination:

• a title,
• an introductory phrase (“these are the generations”),
• a common opening phrase (“hear,” “thus says the Lord”),
• a rhetorical question,
• a shift in time, place, characters or speakers, theme, genre, pace, tense, or mood.

End markers can include:

• a closing formula,
• a poetic refrain,
• a conclusion or summary,
• a flashback.

A unit should also function as an independent, self-contained, complete package, marked by:

• uniqueness in time, place, participants, theme, genre, or speed of action,
• easy accessibility to the audience,
• internal compatibility of content,
• a consistent package size — typically 15–20 pages (large), a Bible chapter (medium), or a single sentence to a few paragraphs (small),
• a typical count of 7 or 13–14 units, though 3 or 5 are also possible.

The arrangement of units

Three basic types of arrangement exist, and they can also be combined:

• linear (a-b-c-d-e-f),
• parallel (a-b-c-a’-b’-c’),
• symmetric (a-b-c-‘b’-a’).

Many combinations are possible:

• a-b-c-d-e-a’ combines linear and symmetric patterns — like a sentence that opens with an assumption and closes with a summary that proves it.
• a-b-c-d-‘b’-c’-a’ is a modified symmetry, blending symmetric and parallel patterns, which draws the reader’s attention specifically to the b’-c’ switch.
• a-a’-b-b’-c-c’-d-d’ combines linear and parallel patterns and can tell parallel but distinct stories, as in Gen. 38/2–50/26.

The very same story can even be read in more than one pattern at once. Gen. 37/2–50/26, for example, can be read as a-b-c-d-e-f-g-g’-f’-e’-d’-c’-b’-a’, or equally as a-a’-b-b’-c-c’-d-d’-e-e’-f-f’-g-g’.

Linear pattern

Linear patterns are the easiest to follow. They can be:

• chronological — stories with some overlap in the timeline, a flashback, or other framing devices, or
• non-chronological — organized spatially (north, east, south, west), by collection, or along the alphabet.

Parallel pattern

Parallel patterns follow a scheme like a-b-c-a’-b’-c’, where each x’ shares a similar theme or structure with its corresponding x. Take Ps. 19/1–2:

• a: the heavens
• b: tell of
• c: God’s glory
• a’: the heavens
• b’: proclaim
• c’: his work

Some parts may not fit the pattern at all — they can trail off at the end (a-b-c-a’-b’-c’, d), sit in the middle (a-b-c-d-a’-b’-c’), or, more rarely, appear at the beginning (a-b-c-d-a’-b’-c’).

Parallel patterns aren’t always easy to spot, but they create a real sense of anticipation and satisfaction once recognized. We see the same effect in fairy tales like The Three Little Pigs: by the second house we think we’ve learned the pattern, and the author can then surprise us in the third, where he delivers the lecture.

A parallel pattern:

• makes the material easier to remember,
• and can introduce comparison, contrast, emphasis, explanation, or illustration.

Take Jonah as an example. In the tables below, bold marks one recurring theme and italic marks its paired counterpart, so you can trace how each element in the first half is answered by its match in the second:

• a: Jonah’s commission and disobedience (1:1–3)
  • b: Jonah and the Gentile Sailors: YHWH is merciful (1/4–16)
    • c: Jonah’s Response to YHWH’s Mercy: Praise (1–17–2/10)
• a’: Jonah’s Recommitment and Obedience (3/1–3a)
  • b’: Jonah and the pagan Ninevites: YHWH is merciful (3/3b-10)
    • c’: Jonah’s response to YHWH’s mercy: resentment (4/1–4)
• d: YHWH’s lesson (4/5–11)

This structure leaves the impression that Jonah’s first prayer was hypocritical and his second selfish — a judgment the story never states outright but conveys entirely through its own arrangement, without ever moralizing.

Symmetric patterns

These follow a pattern like a-b-b’-a’, as in Isa.22/22, which plays on the idea of “open/close”:

• a: he shall open
  • b: and no one will shut
  • b’: he shall shut
• a’: and no one will open

Traced out, this forms the left half of an X — the Greek letter Chi — which is why this kind of pattern is called a chiasm.

The same technique can shape entire books of the Bible, as in Judg.3/7–16/31. Here too, bold marks one recurring theme and italic marks its paired counterpart, so you can see how the outer units answer each other around the central turning point:

• a: Othniel and his good wife (3/7–11)
  • b: Ehud and the victory at the Jordan fords (3/12–31)
    • c: Deborah: enemy’s skull crushed by woman (4/1–5/31)
      • d: Gideon: turning point (6/1–8/32)
    • c’: Abimelech: judge’s skull crushed by woman (8/33–10/5)
  • b’: Jephthah and civil war at the Jordan fords (10/6–12/15)
• a’: Samson and his bad wives (13/1–16/31)

This kind of symmetrical approach has several real advantages:

• Beauty — the aesthetic quality of a balanced presentation.
• Coherence — symmetry reinforces the unity of the whole.
• Completeness — the audience senses the structure winding down and coming full circle.
• Contrapuntal pivot — when the number of units is uneven, as above, a natural turning point emerges that both halves lean toward. In the Judges example, Gideon’s story is that focal point.
• Memory aid — the audience can more easily recall successive points, often enough to learn the whole sequence by heart.
• Opportunities for repetition — comparing, contrasting, reiterating, emphasizing, explaining, or illustrating becomes easier.

It has a cost, too:

• it demands more from the audience to recognize it,
• and it demands more work from the author to construct it.

Even so, the symmetrical form was highly prized in the ancient world, in spite of that cost.

Understanding structures

The structure of a text often carries a large part of its meaning — especially when the text isn’t meant to state its point explicitly, but rather to have an impact, the way the story of the three little pigs works on its listeners.

There are three main ways a structure can convey meaning:

• overall compositional structure,
• structured repetition,
• and position of emphasis.

Overall structure

The overall structure of a passage can carry the author’s message all on its own — the shape of the whole becomes part of what’s being said.

Structured repetition

Not every structural repetition is there to convey meaning; sometimes it exists purely for artistic beauty. Three common types serve that decorative function:

• Structural — helps build a scaffold for the composition. Listing Noah’s three sons both before and after the flood (Gen 6/9–10 and 9/18–19), for example, creates balance and brackets the story.
• Elaboration — the second unit in a paired set develops the theme further. Gen 28/6–9 introduces Esau’s wife, and Gen 36 then traces the rest of Esau’s family in full.
• Second perspective — the second unit retells the first from a different point of view, or summarizes it. The crossing of the Jordan is told from two angles: Josh. 3/9–17 shows the crossing beginning and completing from the eastern side, and Josh. 4/10–13 shows the same event proceeding and completing from the western side.

But structured repetition can also be used to convey meaning directly, as in the prayer of Jonah (Jon. 2/2–9 and 4/1–3).

The advantage of doing it this way is that the author can make a point subtly, which audiences appreciate — most people resist being lectured and grow tired quickly of a point hammered home directly. A subtler structure invites the listener to discover the meaning for themselves, to participate, to think it through. That makes the communication more interesting, more enjoyable, and ultimately more effective. Imagine how pedantic it would feel if The Three Little Pigs opened by simply stating its own moral.

Hebrew literature achieves this in several distinct ways:

• Emphasis — repeating a point drives it home, as in Daniel 2 and 7, where the repeated pattern insists that human kingdoms will rise and fall while only God’s kingdom endures.
• Emphasizing a pattern — drawing attention to a recurring pattern, especially a pattern of behavior, as with Jonah and the Gentiles: Jonah is reluctant to obey God, while the pagans around him readily accept the message and plead for mercy.
• Comparison — two or more units are set side by side to reveal a similarity between things that don’t seem alike, as in Amos 1–2, where Israel is judged by the very same standard as the foreign nations.
• Contrast — the reverse move, showing a difference between things that look similar but aren’t. Genesis 38 and 39 both show a son of Jacob confronted with an illicit sexual invitation from a woman, and in both stories the woman keeps a token from the man to use as evidence later — yet everything else diverges: Judah fails completely and still prospers, while Joseph stays faithful and is punished for it.
• Reversal — highlighting the reversal of a situation, as between 1 Kings 3–11 (the rise of Solomon’s reign and the building of the temple) and 2 Kings 18–25 (the end of that reign and the temple’s destruction).
• Reciprocity — showing reciprocal action across matching units, as in Song of Songs 2/8–17 (the young man invites the young woman to join him) and 7/11–8/4 (she invites him to join her in the country).
• Resolution (or fulfillment) — emphasizing the close link between a story’s opening tension, suspense, or prediction and its closing resolution, as between Gen 12/1–9 (Abram and Sarah’s childlessness) and 21/1–7 (Isaac’s birth).
• Totality — showing the totality of a phenomenon by presenting both halves of a merism, such as day and night or man and woman, as between Isa. 2/10–22 (the future humiliation of proud men) and 3/16–17 (the future humiliation of proud women).

Positions of Prominence

Position within a structure can also reinforce or convey meaning. Modern storytellers tend to place their most important message in the next-to-last unit, since that’s the climax, leaving the final unit for the denouement, the fade-out.

Hebrew literature works differently. In linear and parallel structures, the position of prominence is the very last unit, since that’s what the audience hears last.

• In an odd-numbered parallel scheme, the unmatched final unit is accentuated by standing outside the pattern, as in a-b-c-a’-b’-c’-d.
• In a symmetric scheme, the center is usually the position of prominence when the number of units is odd; when it’s even, prominence falls instead on the first and last units, as in Ex. 21/2–22/27, where the beginning and end both deal with capital offenses and with kindness to the poor.

That position of prominence can carry several kinds of meaning:

• Turning point — the center marks the story’s actual turning point, as with Ehud (Judg. 3/12–30), where the turn comes when he kills the king. The entire structure of Judges likewise turns on Gideon.
• Climax — the same center point can also be the moment of highest tension, as again in Ehud’s story.
• Centerpiece — the center represents the climax outright, as with the wedding at the heart of Song of Songs 3/6–5/1, or Solomon, the temple’s builder, at the center of Chronicles (2 Chr. 1–9).
• Significant pause (or interlude) — a deliberate pause in the action or argument that makes a highly significant point. 2 Kings 2/1–8/6 interrupts the relentless, almost unbroken parade of the kings’ sins with the ministry of Elisha, and 2 Kings 3/21–32 pauses a tragic eulogy to reflect on the profound love of God.

Value of structural analysis

Recognizing these structures pays off in several ways.

• Appreciation of literary artistry — we come to appreciate the skill and care behind the text, so that writing which first looked chaotic reveals itself as an elegant arrangement.
• Identification of unit boundaries — seeing the structure helps us interpret the text correctly. 1 Kings 1–2, for instance, is really the conclusion of Samuel, not the introduction to the rest of Kings; and the five books of Moses together with Joshua form a single unit, since the story was never meant to end with Israel merely on the verge of the promised land.
• Discovering the rationale behind a unit’s layout — this deepens our sense of how the text flows. The two stories of Abraham lying about his wife, for example, are linked to the two promises concerning Ishmael and to the migrations of Lot’s family. Song of Songs places the wedding at its center for poetic reasons, and the intimacy described beforehand isn’t an endorsement of premarital sex but part of a deliberate chiastic arrangement. Isaiah’s call in chapter 6 seems out of place, since one would expect it at the very beginning of the book, yet it sits at the center of Isaiah 1–12 for a reason.
• Clarifying the relationship of parts to the whole — especially useful in long units. Isa. 26–35 and 40–48 mirror each other in function, with Isa. 36–39 serving as the thematic center between them.
• Explaining repetitions — repetition can confuse modern readers, but it helped the original hearer track the text’s structure. The repeated refrain of morning and evening, and the count of each day, marks the completion of each day in Genesis 1.
• Explaining apparently misplaced units — some passages seem out of place until structural analysis clarifies their position. Genesis 38 seems to interrupt the Joseph story, but it exists to contrast Judah’s behavior with Joseph’s conduct at Potiphar’s house — Judah’s wrongful treatment of Tamar, for which he faces no real consequence, sets up the later chapter where Judah gives up his own firstborn rights in favor of Joseph.
• Clarifying a unit by its counterpart — the meaning or function of one unit can often be clarified simply by comparing it to its structural counterpart elsewhere in the text.

Sources